One of the things I find amazing about the fan’s reaction to the return of Catherine Tate as a full time companion is the sheer conservatism of their alternative. They really, really, really wanted sparkly Sally Sparrow from the episode Blink to replace Martha Jones. Whilst I have no real objection to the lovely Carey Mulligan becoming the Doctor’s travelling companion, I cannot help but think that it would not have been a very original development. Another twenty-something contemporary female, just like Rose and Martha. At least Donna will be something different, a prickly older character who wont follow the Doctor with sad puppy-dog eyes because he is not in the slightest bit interested in her romantically.
I would really like to see an historical female companion for the Doctor who is from somewhere between 1880 and 1914. Originally Martha was going to be an Edwardian Maid, but that idea was spiked by senior management in London who insisted that the companion should be from the present day. Well with Martha due to return mid Series Four [30], after Donna, now that the paradigm has shifted then a historical female as a second companion is at least possible.
However, the production team at Upper Boat would be wise to remember the character of Victoria Waterfield from the 1960’s. She became the Doctor’s companion after Evil of the Daleks, when everything she ever knew was destroyed by the malignant pepper pots. The character quickly lost all traces of her Victorian background, mainly because the writers were expecting the character of Samantha Briggs to continue and were unprepared for a Victorian Lady in the scripts they were writing. Very little effort was made to help the character of Victioria fit into the sixties dolly-bird shaped hole that Pauline Collins’ descision not to take up a full time role in Doctor Who left in Series 5.
So if a historical, preferably Victorian character were to be introduced, RTD n Crew would have to consider the fallowing pionts:
- Clothing : Even as late as the 1970’s women generally wore skirts or dresses all the time. So an historical character would not be seen wearing trousers until at least her third or fourth story. The Doctor and his contemporary female companion would be able to get her to ditch the corsetry and crinoline/bustle, but the historical character would still be seen in ankle length skirts or dresses. I emphasise long skirts because an historical character would rather be naked in Church than be seen in public wearing a mini-skirt, unless it was her last story and she left the Doctor to marry someone from the 1960’s.
- Progress : The Victorian and Edwardians especially believed that there was a general progression from ancient to modern. So an historical female companion would be in awe of anything from the future or alien planet, but be highly dismissive of anything from before her own era.
- Class : Social station was vitally important before the 1960’s. If the character introduced was an Edwardian Maid then she would automatically defer to the Doctor and contemporary female companion because she would initially seen them as her social superiors. Likewise if the historical companion came from a wealthy background, she might regard the Doctor as her equal, but be very snooty towards anyone she regards as from a lower social order. In the course of a story she would need that sort of thinking to be knocked out of her.
- Can Never Go Home : When it eventually does become time to write the character out of the series, she will not be the same person she was at the start of her journey with the Doctor, and no way would she be able to go back to her old life. I should imagine that the Doctor, with the help of either UNIT or Torchwood, will be able to set her up in a new life with a new identity in modern day London.
